Most Ladies today are just like Kim Kardashian – OAP Freeze Reveals Dirty Exposé

Morals are fast eroding in society, it takes good family upbringing for a lady to be decent today: Most women are like Kim Kardashian... the only difference is Kim gets paid. A very close ‘married’ friend of mine came around the other day asking me for help. He is into construction and due to the dwindling financial situation in the country he hasn’t sold a house in almost 1 year. So he hands over his iPhone to me to show me some of the his properties asking me to scroll through his gallery. After scrolling through about 25 pictures of houses I stumbled upon a n*ked ‘kpek*s’. I tried to quickly scroll away, but before I could my eyes swallowed another and another and another. There were an assortment of pictures of different ‘bits’ and ‘pieces’ of a woman’s n*ked body without showing her face. A bit embarrassed, I handed his phone over to him. Without a hint of shame, he explained to me that that was his separated account manager he has been ‘shagging’ for a while. According to him, she has a son and she is hot!!!! As I write this, my mind’s eye, I still clearly sees the expression of excitement in his eyes as he described every detail of her body (the remaining 20% I missed in the pictures) he even offered to bring her over to Chocolat Royale so I could meet his ‘trophy’. 2 days later, I stepped out of a meeting in the office only to see about 16 missed calls of which 13 were from my friend. I returned his call and he complained about me not picking my phone that he was at Chocolat Royale with his ‘babe’ and he wanted me to meet her. So I rushed out of my office to Royale to meet them. She was sitting with her back towards the door when I walked in and I mentally tried to match the pieces I had seen on my guys phone to that of the lady in front of me and when she turned around to greet me with a smile that faded immediately she set her eyes on me! My friend must have told her he had a surprise for her or not even told her at all trying to surprise her because I guarantee that if this woman knew she was coming to meet ‘freeze’ she would never have agreed as she is the wife of one of my schoolmates who resides in Yankee (A Pastor).... Here I am, staring at my friend’s wife sitting next to my other friend, who I know is an absolute freak. I know he must have dissected her body and used it to its maximum potential. My friend also never uses protection because he is quite ‘endowed’ and finds it uncomfortable. He is married and has a string of girlfriends. His wife may or may not have an affair and his girls are mainly university students he is ‘taking care of’. Experience has shown me that most university girls dating rich men, usually have one or two ‘school boyfriends’ who cater to their school needs i.e. Club parties, academic issues etc. My fear for my pastor friend is that he now comes home from America once or twice a year and dips into a grimy pool of illnesses and issues both physical and spiritual, shared by at least 20 and as many as 50 other people, because as the saying goes, “you have slept with everyone your partner has slept with”. I am still in a dilemma right now, do I tell my friend or do I hold my tongue and ‘save their marriage’? Anyway back to the main issue…….. There are many differences between Kim Kardashian and my pastor friend’s wife. One is Kanye knows his woman, this includes her abilities, shortfalls etc while my pastor friend ‘thinks’ he knows his wife. He is probably worshiping in the church of ‘assumption’ right now, thinking his wife is a good, decent girl. The second issue is while his ‘decent’ wife only earns peanuts for her nudes and requires him sending her a monthly allowance from the US, Kim just paid Kanye’s $53million debt. Rewind to about a month ago when I put up a post saying I would want to have a Kimye relationship with bae he called me up, telling me, in his own words, “to stop glorifying a morally bankrupt woman and her sinful relationship”. My question now, is his own relationship less sinful & more morally upright?

Senate President Saraki faces trial today

NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW

The Senate President Bukola faces a court hearing today – He has been charged with 13 counts of false declarations – Saraki has denied all the charges laid against him All is set for the trial of the Senate President, Dr. Bukola Saraki, before the Code of Conduct Tribunal on 13 counts of alleged false assets declaration to begin today. The prosecution team led by Rotimi Jacobs had said it will produce 13 prosecution witnesses to testify in the case. The Supreme Court, through its judgment delivered on February 5, 2016, had paved the way for the trial to begin after dismissing the Senate President’s objection to the validity of the charges and the jurisdiction of the CCT to hear the case. The Danladi Umar-led tribunal subsequently fixed March 10 for the commencement of the trial, but it later shifted the date to March 11, following a request by Saraki’s new lead counsel, Kanu Agabi. According to a statement issued on March 1 by the Head, Press and Public Relations of the CCT Ibraheem Al-hassan, Agabi pleaded with the tribunal for a shift in the trial date to enable him to attend to other urgent matters. The CCT spokesperson said Agabi conveyed his request to the CCT in a letter dated February 26, 2016. Saraki was arraigned on 13 counts of false assets declaration on September 22, 2015. In the charges instituted by the Federal Government, Saraki was accused of making false assets declaration in his forms submitted to the Code of Conduct Bureau as a two-term Governor of Kwara State between 2003 and 2011. Saraki, who was said to have submitted four assets declaration forms investigated by the CCB, was allegedly found to have “corruptly acquired many properties while in office as the Governor of Kwara State but failed to declare some of them in the said forms earlier filled and submitted.” He also allegedly made an anticipatory declaration of assets upon his assumption of office as governor. He was also accused of sending money abroad to purchase property in London and that he maintained an account outside Nigeria while serving as a governor. Saraki initially refused to appear before the tribunal, prompting the CCT to issue a bench warrant against him. He voluntarily submitted himself to the tribunal before the arrest warrant could be executed. The tribunal rejected his request for the quashing of the 13 counts shortly after he was arraigned on September 22, 2015. He appealed to the Court of Appeal, Abuja Division, against the decision of the CCT to continue the trial. But by a two-to-one split decision of its three-man bench, led by Justice Moore Admein, the Court of Appeal dismissed the Senate president’s appeal. Saraki, in his further appeal to the Supreme Court, asked the apex court to quash the charges filed against him, citing among his seven grounds of appeal, that the CCT lacked jurisdiction to try him as it was constituted by two instead of three members. But a seven-man panel of the apex court presided over by the Chief Justice of Nigeria, Justice Mahmud Mohammed, unanimously ruled in its judgment on February 5 that Saraki’s appeal against the jurisdiction of the CCT and the competence of the charges lacked merit. Justice Walter Onnoghen, who delivered the lead judgment, dismissed all of Saraki’s seven grounds of appeal, affirming that the charges instituted against him were valid and that the tribunal was validly constituted with requisite jurisdiction to try him. The Chief Justice of Nigeria, Justice Mahmud Mohammed, and other members of the full panel of the apex court, comprising Justices Tanko Muhammad, Sylvester Ngwuta, Kudirat Kekere-Ekun, Chima Nweze and Amiru Sanusi, also consented to the judgment. Meanwhile, Justice Abdukadir Abdu-Kafarati of the federal high court in Abuja, on March 1, fixed March 22 for his judgment in a fundamental human rights enforcement suit, through which the Senate President is asking for an order to stop his trial before the CCT. But at the hearing of the case on March 1, Jacobs urged the court not to grant Saraki’s prayer, as that, according to him, will amount to overruling the judgment of the Supreme Court. The Independent Corrupt Practices and other related offences Commission, represented by Suleiman Abdukareem, supported Jacobs’ contention in opposing the Senate President’s suit. But Saraki’s lawyer, Mr. Ajibola Oluyede, urged the court to stop the CCT trial on the grounds that the Senate President’s right to a fair hearing was breached during the investigation of the allegations leading to the charges preferred against him. Oluyede argued that the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission usurped the powers of the Code of Conduct Bureau to investigate the details of assets declared by the Senate President and filed charges relating to the infraction discovered. https://www.facebook.com/Torchwonder